Get All Access for $5/mo

The Sharing Economy is Misnamed But Deserves Celebration Anyway Technology and the profit motive are creating more opportunity for entrepreneurs and better prices for consumers.

By Andrew Geant Edited by Dan Bova

Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

We've heard a lot lately about the "sharing economy" as well as the "collaborative economy" – two terms that are often used interchangeably but probably shouldn't be. Seemingly, every corner of the economy is now being "disrupted" by this new breed of businesses.

Consider the variety of practices that fall into the sharing economy: you can buy orsell rides (Uber), rooms (Airbnb), loans (Prosper), crafts (Etsy), tasks (Handybook), cleaning services (Homejoy), freelance work (Elance), tutoring (WyzAnt, my company) and all sorts of other products and services.

Related: How Your Business Can Get in on the Sharing Economy

But when you look closely at these companies, there's actually very little sharing or collaboration involved. They are awesome businesses and very much part of a new economy, but they have been mislabeled.

It's utopian to think that this new economy, whatever we want to call it, is thriving on such virtuous characteristics as sharing and collaboration. I don't aim to diminish the importance of companies in this category. In fact, my own company, WyzAnt, is squarely in the middle of this trend. Certainly there are common threads among these businesses and reasons why several of them have grown exponentially to multibillion dollar valuations. But sharing and collaboration are not part of the secret sauce. What makes these businesses special and successful are the concepts of participation and utilization.

"Participation'' and "utilization'' are better terms for this new sector of the economy because these adjectives describe concepts that sharing and collaboration have never fully captured. So let's get our definitions aligned

Participation: noun; the action of taking part in something. Businesses like Uber, Airbnb and Etsy increase accessibility to goods and services that were historically limited by regulation, price, awareness and other factors. This is true for both supply and demand (riders and drivers, hosts and travelers, and buyers and sellers). These businesses cause participation to increase among all parties.

Utilization: noun; putting to use; turning to profitable account. Utilization is another way of saying that these businesses take advantage of excess supply and latent demand. This is where the term "sharing" is often substituted incorrectly ( When I rent a spare bedroom on Airbnb, it is a business transaction, not sharing. I'm motivated by profit to utilize a resource I control).

Almost all of the businesses in the sharing/collaborative economy discussion are two-sided businesses with marketplace characteristics. To illustrate this point, let's look at participation and utilization on both the supply and demand sides of a few companies you know.

Uber. Historically, black car rides were reserved for professionals and the wealthy. Today, Uber's great technology and efficient marketplace drastically reduce prices and improve access, thus enabling more people to enjoy this service.

Uber is also increasing participating on the demand side by lowering barriers to becoming a private driver. At the same time, Uber allows drivers to increase the utilization of their vehicles. Due to the liquidity in the Uber marketplace, they don't have to search as long or drive as far to find a passenger.

Related: The Future of the Sharing Economy Is a World Built Like Bitcoin

Airbnb. Utilization is the core of Airbnb's value proposition for hosts. Why let your apartment sit vacant when you can make money renting it?

From a macro perspective, few hosts would participate in the hospitality industry except Airbnb's technology and services make it simple for them to do so. On the traveler side, Airbnb's affordability encourages more people to take trips, increasing participation in travel generally (at least that's what Airbnb would argue).

Etsy. Without Etsy, many craftspeople would be relegated to selling through local and offline channels. Few would have the means to participate in online commerce and may be unable to sustain an independent business. Similarly, without Etsy, fewer people would order handmade goods, personalized gifts or custom artwork. Etsy also enables sellers to utilize their unique skills as artisans, whereas without Etsy, some sellers would have to do other work to make a living.

Uber, Airbnb and Etsy are the talk of the town today but Ebay invented the category. There are plenty of other rising businesses that are driven by participation and utilization: Odesk, Elance, Prosper, WyzAnt, TaskRabbit, Homejoy, Handybook, Threadflip, Liquidspace, ZipCar and UShip, to name a few.

The Role of Technology. All of these businesses compete in established industries by leveraging technology (and often a two-sided marketplace business model) to bring down the price point for consumers and improve the historic take-rate of suppliers. They find innovative ways to enhance the traditional experience, such as Uber's mobile app for drivers and riders. This is possible only with technology and the Internet.

A small subset of companies in the "sharing" and "collaborative" economy does, in fact, have aspects of sharing and collaboration, in addition to participation and utilization. These include businesses like Lyft, Couchsurfing, Kickstarter and Indiegogo, where the brands are deeply rooted in the user community and have a big social component.

The fact that Uber, Airbnb and Etsy don't involve sharing and collaboration is no knock against these businesses. Rather, we should celebrate these businesses for creating better marketplaces than the institutions they replaced.

Passengers now take nicer cars and drivers make more money. People make use of their empty rooms and travelers pay lower fees. Craftsmen can finally make a living and consumers can purchase high quality goods that would otherwise be unavailable. But let's call a spade a spade. These businesses belong to the "participation" and "utilization'' economy.

Related: Tread Lightly on Regulating the Sharing Economy

Andrew Geant

CEO and Co-Founder of WyzAnt

Andrew Geant is co-founder and CEO of Wyzant, which is dedicated to connecting millions of students with expert tutors via the largest tutoring marketplace in the US. Drew co-founded Wyzant in 2005 with his Princeton classmate, Mike Weishuhn. Today, Wyzant offers over 80,000 experts in hundreds of subject areas including all levels of academic subjects, graduate studies and professional skills, and provides students flexibility in learning truly anywhere through Wyzant's proprietary online tutoring platform.

Want to be an Entrepreneur Leadership Network contributor? Apply now to join.

Editor's Pick

Side Hustle

At 16, She Started a Side Hustle While 'Stuck at Home.' Now It's on Track to Earn Over $3.1 Million This Year.

Evangelina Petrakis, 21, was in high school when she posted on social media for fun — then realized a business opportunity.

Health & Wellness

I'm a CEO, Founder and Father of 2 — Here Are 3 Practices That Help Me Maintain My Sanity.

This is a combination of active practices that I've put together over a decade of my intense entrepreneurial journey.

Business News

Remote Work Enthusiast Kevin O'Leary Does TV Appearance Wearing Suit Jacket, Tie and Pajama Bottoms

"Shark Tank" star Kevin O'Leary looks all business—until you see the wide view.

Business News

Are Apple Smart Glasses in the Works? Apple Is Eyeing Meta's Ran-Ban Success Story, According to a New Report.

Meta has sold more than 700,000 pairs of smart glasses, with demand even ahead of supply at one point.

Money & Finance

The 'Richest' U.S. City Probably Isn't Where You Think It Is

It's not located in New York or California.

Business News

Hybrid Workers Were Put to the Test Against Fully In-Office Employees — Here's Who Came Out On Top

Productivity barely changed whether employees were in the office or not. However, hybrid workers reported better job satisfaction than in-office workers.