5 Mistakes Entrepreneurs Make When Pitching Their Ideas to Investors While entrepreneurs work hard to get a meeting with an investor, not all come prepared.

By Arie Abecassis Edited by Frances Dodds

Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

REUTERS | Phil McCarten

Entrepreneurs tend to work quite hard to nail down meetings with investors. It usually takes a combination of good targeting, persistence and finding a way in.

As an investor, what has astounded me over the years -- after listening to thousands of pitches -- is that many entrepreneurs do not put the same effort in preparing for an initial meeting as they do in securing it.

Below are what I have found to be the five most common oversights that can turn a meeting sideways. The good news is that each of them is not only completely avoidable but, if addressed properly, can lead to fruitful discussions.

Related: 6 Tips for Overcoming a 'No' When Seeking Funding

1. Not knowing your audience.

Many first-time entrepreneurs tend to get so excited to speak with investors that they forget to do a little homework to understand who they are meeting with and how a particular investor may be a good fit for their startup. This is setting an entrepreneur up for failure. It's critical to understand the profile of the investor you're speaking with: What stage do they typically invest in? Have they made any investments in your sector? Is there a particular reason that they should be excited by what you're doing?

It's easy to check an investor's profile on LinkedIn or AngelList to get a good sense of whether there's the potential for a good match.

2. Depending too much on the deck.

Sometimes, entrepreneurs place too much emphasis on preparing a terrific deck that tells their story and then are thrown for a loop when investors resort to having a conversation. While you should always have a deck on hand for a meeting, take the opportunity to own the conversation and listen to what an investor's hot buttons or concerns might be. Always start with the elevator pitch, why your team is the one to execute the vision and why this particular investor should be involved. Decks typically work best if there are many people in the room, since they provide a structure to communicate. Otherwise, use your deck as a tool to re-inforce the conversation by sharing it as a follow-up to your meeting to help set the stage for the next conversation.

Related: The One Simple Tool for Transforming Your Relationship With Investors

3. Stating there is no competition.

This is a faux pas that prompts investors to think you may not be aware of what you're up against. Competition exists everywhere and is not bound by geography or what you only see with the naked eye. The competitive landscape can be made up of existing companies or new startups that are being hatched in a lab somewhere. Even the most disruptive startups compete for dollars or mindshare that is currently being directed elsewhere. You should understand the alternatives your customer has for your product or service and be able to articulate why they are better off changing their behavior.

4. Having no data to back up your assumptions.

Regardless of the industry in which you compete, you need customers to build a business and over the long-term, you need to demonstrate a path to profitability. Whether your customers are individual consumers or businesses, it will cost you to have them try your product as well as keep them coming back.

There are a variety of metrics that apply to all businesses that relate to this, including: customer acquisition cost (CAC), churn and lifetime value (LTV). These are basic principles which form the underlying framework for your revenue model. Make sure you know them inside and out.

If your startup is too early in its formation with very limited history, establish assumptions that can be supported based on what others in the industry are doing.

5. Forgetting the follow-up step.

Whether your initial meeting with an investor has gone well or not, you should not leave without an understanding of what the next steps should be. Many times, entrepreneurs are a bit hesitant to get direct feedback, with the fear that they might not like what they are about to hear. If the meeting has gone well, you can ask the investor what other information they need and what they see as a reasonable next step for their evaluation. If the meeting has gone south and it's clear that the fit in not right, ask the investor for suggestions of other investors where the fit might be better. Also, it's good practice to be thankful for their time and ask if they are fine with you including them on future business updates. It never hurts to stay top of mind.

Related: Angels, Venture Capitalists or the Crowd: Who Should Fund Your Startup?

Arie Abecassis

Tech Entrepreneur and Investor

Arie Abecassis is a startup entrepreneur and investor based in New York City. He is a guest instructor at General Assembly and actively serves as an advisor or board member to a variety of tech startups including SeatGeek, Adaptly and BiznessApps.

Want to be an Entrepreneur Leadership Network contributor? Apply now to join.

Side Hustle

How to Start a Side Hustle With Facebook, From 4 People Who Did It and Are Earning More Than $1 Million a Year

More than a third of U.S. adults have a side hustle — and online opportunities abound.

Business Ideas

63 Small Business Ideas to Start in 2024

We put together a list of the best, most profitable small business ideas for entrepreneurs to pursue in 2024.

Business News

How High School Field Hockey Coach Kylie Kelce Took Joe Rogan's No. 1 Podcast Spot

Kylie Kelce, 32, is a mom of three who has found herself surrounded by some pretty famous friends.

Thought Leaders

The Heartbreaking Lose of a Child to Cancer Brought These 3 Founders Together. Now Their Startup Has Raised $60 Million to Fight and Treat the Disease With Cutting-Edge Tech.

What happens when a Silicon Valley entrepreneur, a synthetic biology expert, and a world-renowned cancer researcher team up? They create Earli—a startup rewriting the rules of cancer detection and treatment.