Non-compete clauses are very snarly things. Courts generally don't like them because, in effect, they prevent people from earning a livelihood.
Whether the technology company could enforce the provision depends on a number of factors, all of which are weighed and balanced against each other. These include:
* The time frame of the non-compete (yours, you say, is three years)
* Whether there's any geographic scope to the non-compete (are you prevented from working in Michigan, or anywhere in the U.S.?)
* Whether there are any industry limitations (e.g., prevented from working for any kind of company or only financial services companies)
* The level of expertise you have/access to confidential information you obtained (in other words, were you an essential, high-level executive, or just part of the IT pool?).
The last thing you need, though, is to be hauled into court to fight this out. Bring your non-compete agreement to an employment attorney in your state to evaluate the risks of moving forward in light of its wording.
Nina L. Kaufman is an award-winning business attorney, author and speaker. For more than 15 years, she has successfully navigated thousands of small businesses through the legal hurdles they face in starting and running their companies. Under her
AskTheBusinessLawyer.com brand, she reaches thousands of entrepreneurs and small business owners with her legal services, professional speaking, information products, and
LexAppeal weekly ezine.
