B-BBEE Policy On Trusts, BBOS And ESOPS Remains Unchanged Trusts, BBOS and ESOPs can be used to facilitate achievement of targets under any element of B-BBEE.
Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.
You're reading Entrepreneur South Africa, an international franchise of Entrepreneur Media.
The B-BBEE Act was amended in 2013 and introduced the regulatory body, the B-BBEE Commission, which started operating in 2016.
This regulatory body oversees the implementation of the B-BBEE Act, which means it will help entities to implement proper schemes to comply with the B-BBEE Act, but will also call out those schemes that are merely taking black people for a ride, contrary to what the B-BBEE Act seeks to achieve.
The Codes of Good Practice were amended and issued in 2013, but became effective on 1 May 2015, and they provide rules for measurement of ownership, management control, skills development, enterprise and supplier development and socio-economic development elements.
This piece will only focus on ownership and addresses Trusts, Broad-Based Ownership Schemes (BBOS) and Employee Share Ownership Programmes (ESOP).
The Codes of Good Practice permit the use of Trusts, BBOS and ESOP to facilitate the transfer of ownership to multiple beneficiaries such as employees and community members, amongst others.
The truth about Trusts, BBOS and ESOP as ownership vehicles is in the detail.
No policy shift
Firstly, there is no policy shift, the Trusts, BBOS and ESOP are assessed based on the Codes of Good Practice issued in 2013, which are applicable. Neither the dti or the B-BBEE Commission has changed the rules that are contained in Statement 100 and the applicable rules for Trusts, BBOS and ESOPS in Annexes (B)-(D) of the same Statement.
The approved sector codes also have the same rules, consistent with the generic Codes of Good Practice.
Broad-based structures
Secondly, recent media reports related to major B-BBEE ownership transactions which have been submitted to the B-BBEE Commission for registration as required (which are of R25 million and above in transaction value).
The B-BBEE Commission is clear in its communication that of the 341 ownership transactions submitted to it for registration from 9 June 2017 to December 2018, 33% involved broad-based structures in the form of Trusts, BBOS and ESOPs.
When assessed against the ownership rules, the majority of the schemes involving Trusts, BBOS and ESOPS did not meet the rules set in Statement 100 Annexes (B)-(D), and thus cannot be recognised for ownership points.
Remedial action
Thirdly, the entities affected have been notified in writing about the concerns regarding their specific transactions and afforded an opportunity to remedy the concerns.
Related: To B-BBEE Or Not To B-BBEE
The B-BBEE Commission team has made itself available to assist these entities to do so. Some entities have made an effort to seek clarity and request assistance to align, while others have failed to take steps to remedy the transactions as advised.
Example of typical things to remedy include:
- Amending the Trust Deed to comply by removing provisions that give all the power to the Founder of the Trust to control the Trust, BBOS or ESOP
- Amending the shareholders agreement to afford the Trust, BBOS or ESOP as a shareholder on behalf of black people to be represented on the board of the measured entity to be able to exercise the voting rights as required
- To submit a list of black beneficiaries that are being recognised for such black ownership.
It is alarming that to date, some entities failed to provide a list of beneficiaries on request. These are aspects that can be remedied for entities to properly recognise ownership.
In terms of the B-BBEE Act and regulations, where the entity has been afforded an opportunity to remedy and fails to do so, the B-BBEE Commission may escalate the matter into a formal investigation in terms of which findings can be made.
Those entities that have failed to remedy, others given an opportunity since February/March 2018 and to date have not done so, have been referred for investigation. It being noted that there are other entities that have remedied their transactions and have since been issued with letters confirming compliance, therefore it is doable.
Flexibility that is embedded in the framework
Finally, it is important to dispel the impression created that there is no certainty regarding
B-BBEE, the Act, the Codes of Good Practice as well as approved sector codes are clear as to what the framework and the parameters are.
All sector codes approved by the Minister of Trade and Industry under the B-BBEE Act are recognised for B-BBEE points. There is no change since the amendments in 2013 to the B-BBEE Act and the Codes of Good Practice in regard to this aspect.
Further, as we always state regarding foreign investors who are unable or not permitted by their policies to sell or allocate equity in South Africa, there is the Equity Equivalent Investment Programme that ensures that the entity can make certain commitments which are to be implemented and can be counted in the place of ownership points.
This is the flexibility that is embedded in the B-BBEE framework which entities such as Caterpillar, IBM and Samsung had taken advantage of.
Related: Have You Booked Your Seat For The B-BBEE Management Development Programme?
