New Study Concludes That Standing Isn't Necessarily Healthier Than Sitting Down All Day Both are problematic in that they encourage a sedentary workday.
By Geoff Weiss
Our biggest sale — Get unlimited access to Entrepreneur.com at an unbeatable price. Use code SAVE50 at checkout.*
Claim Offer*Offer only available to new subscribers
Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.
Maybe we just shouldn't even get out of bed in the first place.
After several buzzworthy studies have likened sitting at your desk all day to smoking -- in that both increase the risk of obesity, heart disease, colon cancer and Type 2 Diabetes -- new research suggests that sitting isn't necessarily the silent killer it's purported to be.
A study published last week in the International Journal of Epidemiology examined the health of more than 5,000 Londoners over the course of 16 years. While 450 people died during the survey, none of these deaths were ultimately attributable to sitting, the study concluded.
Related: In This Vision of a Healthier Workplace, Sitting Is Not Allowed
And despite reports to the contrary, standing all day isn't necessarily better than sitting, says Dr. Melvyn Hillsdon, an associate professor at the University of Exeter who co-conducted the study. Both are problematic in that both encourage a sedentary workday.
"The problem lies in the absence of movement rather than the time spent sitting itself," Hillsdon said in a statement. "Any stationary posture where energy expenditure is low may be detrimental to health, be it sitting or standing. The results cast doubt on the benefits of sit-stand work stations."
So what are we left with? It looks like treadmill desks may indeed be the way forward. Just please promise us that human-sized hamster wheels aren't actually going to become a thing anytime soon.
Related: Does This Desk Increase Productivity or Simply Make You Look Ridiculous?
